Clean-up job may never be finished
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The immensely long life of some radioactive substances means the job of decommissioning a big nuclear reactor will not be completed for decades, and maybe centuries - if ever.
The immensely long life of some radioactive substances means the job of decommissioning a big nuclear reactor will not be completed for decades, and maybe centuries - if ever.
Although the spent atomic fuel can be removed easily, and other radioactive waste taken off site, the core of the reactor has to be left in situ. It is simply too massive and, after years of nuclear bombardment, too dangerously radioactive to shift. It could be cut up with robots, but this would magnify the problem, as encasing the scrap with enough steel and concrete to keep it safe would increase its volume tenfold.
The usual strategy is to make the reactor building secure and then simply wait. This approach is being adopted by British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL), which is already decommissioning three early nuclear power stations, Berkeley on the river Severn, Trawsfynydd in North Wales and Hunterston in Scotland.
The structures of their "piles", the reactors themselves, have been contaminated with cobalt-60, whose effects take years to decay away. The BNFL spokesman David Cartwright said: "It's up to society to decide when the radioactive hazards have fallen to acceptable levels. We think that will be around 100 years from now."
Dounreay's reactors were fuelled with plutonium, which is active for much longer. Its "half-life" - the time it takes for half of a given amount to decay to lead - is 24,000 years.
Green groups tend to agree with the storage policy, because there is no depository in which to keep scrap if the reactor is dismantled. But the length of time that may have to be allowed for that is well illustrated in a Friends of the Earth poster from the 1970s, showing a Roman centurion on guard. "If the Romans had had nuclear power," the caption ran, "we'd still be guarding their waste."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments