Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Half of UK children can’t identify stinging nettles, study finds

Nearly half of children do not know what brambles, blackberries and bluebells look like

Phoebe Weston
Science Correspondent
Wednesday 14 August 2019 06:25 BST
Comments
One in four children didn't know what a badger, robin or conker looked like. Pictured is a stinging nettle
One in four children didn't know what a badger, robin or conker looked like. Pictured is a stinging nettle (Getty/iStock)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

They might be all over the countryside but more than half of UK children are unable to identify stinging nettles, according to new research.

One in four children also don't know what a badger or robin looks like, according to researchers who showed pictures of British wildlife and plants to 1,000 children between the age of five and 16.

They also found 83 per cent were unable to identify a bumblebee, 82 per cent didn’t know what an oak tree leaf looked like, and only half of them correctly identified a puffin.

Nearly half of children could not identify brambles, blackberries and bluebells.

Educational psychologist Dr Dion Terrelonge said: “In some ways children are very aware of the natural world, thanks, in part, to television shows such as Blue Planet and increased conversations around environmental issues.

“However, this alone is no substitute for actually experiencing the natural world through exploring it with each of our senses.”

A quarter of parents say their children have little to no interest in the natural world and one in three said spending too much time sitting in front of a screen was to blame, according to the study.

Dr Terrelonge said: “Technology has changed unrecognisably over the past twenty years, with children having many more options for indoor play, whether it be TV, gaming, or social media, than ever before, and the pull of screen time can be almost irresistible for children and parents.

“We also have fewer green spaces and greater parental anxiety about allowing children to play outside, and hygiene; all of this will undoubtedly contribute to children having the opportunity to get outside.”

The research, which was commissioned by family activity app Hoop and carried out by Pickersgill Consultancy and Planning (PCP), also found 97 per cent of children could not identify a beech leaf and 96 per cent could not identify a cabbage white butterfly.

The findings support another report earlier this year by Natural England that found one in five children living in England’s most deprived areas spend no time in the natural environment.

Dr Terrelonge said: “Children learn through play, therefore the best way for them to learn about the natural world is to get out there, play in it and experience it.”

Kentucky wildlife officials use electrofishing to fight invasive species

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in