Council orders two 70ft trees deemed a ‘hedge’ to be felled despite local anger
Evergreens cannot be cut back as they would be ‘unlikely to survive’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Residents in Bristol have expressed their concern after the local council announced two cypress trees measuring 20 metres tall are to be felled following a complaint that they blocked light to a nearby property.
Bristol City Council classed the pair of mature trees as a “nuisance” and declared they should be cut down.
Council officers said the Lawson cypress trees fell foul of a section of the Anti Social Behaviour Act which states that two or more evergreen or semi-evergreen trees or shrubs in a line that extend more than two metres in height and act as a barrier to light or access should be classed as a “high hedge”.
The trees cannot be cut back to a suitable height as they would be unlikely to survive, the council said.
Lawson cypress trees – which are native to California and were introduced to Britain in 1854 – can grow to 45 metres.
The decision triggered an angry response from local residents who say the two trees are popular with local children and wildlife.
Laura Lawrenson, who lives directly opposite the trees, told the SWNS news agency: “That is not a hedge. That is two really beautiful trees that have grown together.
”It's also a real shame, because those trees have been there since the early 1970s, at the same time as the estate was built. Everybody is really sad about it.“
Chris Coldbreath, who also lives locally, said: ”Let's be realistic, the intention of the act is to stop the spread of 10ft hedges along borders.
“It wasn't intended to chop down 70ft trees that have been in an open area for years - trees full of wildlife that is now going to be made homeless. The whole thing is a travesty.“
A spokesperson for the council defended designating the 70ft trees as a hedge, saying it was in line with national legislation, and said officers had received a “number of comments from local residents supporting” their felling.
”Reducing these trees to the necessary size would leave them unlikely to survive and removing and replanting the tree has been agreed as the best option,” the spokesperson said.
“We're also investigating and offering further tree-planting spots to bring us closer to our aim of doubling the city's tree canopy by 2046.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments