Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Arctic oil drilling: Environmentalists condemn Obama decision to permit Shell exploration project in Chukchi Sea

Project due to take place in remote and dangerous location

Andrew Buncombe
Tuesday 12 May 2015 20:43 BST
Comments
The Kulluk rig ran adrift in 2012
The Kulluk rig ran adrift in 2012 (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Environmentalists have questioned a decision by the Obama administration to approve oil drilling in the Arctic – the first since such exploration since a 2012 accident that saw a drilling rig run aground.

The Arctic is estimated to contain up to 20 per cent of the world’s untapped oil and gas reserves, but the process is difficult and dangerous and experts say its extraction could be years away.

On Monday, the Obama government gave conditional approval to a plan from Shell to drill for oil in the Chukchi Sea. Experts say it could hold up to 15 billion barrels of oil, but that it is one of the most difficult places to explore, given its remoteness and the absence of deep sea ports.

Shell has said it wants to drill six wells as part of its exploration project
Shell has said it wants to drill six wells as part of its exploration project (Reuters)

Environmental campaigners have said the remote nature of the location would make it difficult for any sort of clean-up operation in the result of an accident. It is up to 1,000 miles from a coast guard base.

“It's certainly a significant misstep in the wrong direction. We need to go the other way if we are serious about adressing climate change, let alone protecting our last pristine ocean," Franz Matzner of the Natural Resources Defence Council told The Independent.

“It's a dirty, dangerous, unnecessary business."

Reuters said that Shell has already spent about $6bn on exploration in the Arctic and proposes to drill up to six wells in water that is said to be 40 metres deep.

Protesters in the Netherlands
Protesters in the Netherlands (Getty)

As part of the conditional approval, Shell must obtain permits from the federal government and the state of Alaska in order to begin drilling this summer.

Shell has not drilled in the Arctic since 2012 season, when the company was forced to evacuate its Kulluk drill rig (above), which eventually ran aground on rocks. The company was able to recover the estimated 150,000 gallons of oil and lubricants the vessel without any loss.

In a statement, Shell said: “The approval of our Revised Chukchi Sea Exploration Plan is an important milestone and signals the confidence regulators have in our plan."

Asked about the environmental concerns that have been raised, a spokeswoman, Kayla Macke, said: "Our whole ethos of drilling in Arctic conditions is based on prevention and stopping any incident before it can lead to a pollution event."

She added: "Our oil spill response plan is approved and is one of the most robust, most scrutinised plans and collection of equipment and capabilities of any offshore exploration programme in the world."

One of the vessels that Shell plans to use this summer, the Noble Discoverer, also had problems in the harsh Arctic waters in 2012. At one point it had to be towed to port after experiencing vibrations in a propeller shaft, the news agency said

Even if Shell gets all the permits it needs, its Arctic plans may face a hurdle further south. Last week, the city of Seattle ruled that its port must apply for a permit to allow Shell to make it a hub for drilling rigs headed to the Arctic.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in