New warning that collapse of Antarctica ‘sleeping giant’ could raise sea level more than 16ft
“This means the fate of the world’s largest ice sheet very much remains in our hands,” says one expert
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
The collapse of Antarctica’s “sleeping giant” could cause planetary-scale change in the coming centuries, according to a new warning from scientists.
If the climate crisis continues on its current trajectory, then melting of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) alone could contribute around 3-10 feet (1-3metres) of sea-level rise by 2300, and 7-16.4ft (2-5m) by 2500.
The research, by an international team of scientists, was published on Wednesday in the academic journal Nature.
The team points out that this potentially catastrophic outcome of global heating could be avoided if the world meets the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement. Nearly every country signed up to the pact to play their part in limiting global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius, or at least “well below” 2C.
The planet has currently warmed around 1.1C since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. With greenhouse gas emissions, largely caused by burning fossil fuels, continuing unabated, the planet is on track to hit 2.7C by 2100.
However, research showed that if global temperatures remains well below 2C, the East Antarctic sheet is predicted to add less than half a metre to sea-level rise by the year 2500.
If dramatic cuts are made to emissions, then it’s projected that the “sleeping giant” -- which holds the majority of glacier ice on Earth -- will likely not add to sea-level rise in the coming decades.
Though, some sea-level rise will still be unavoidable due to melting in West Antarctica and the Arctic region. Notably, the window of opportunity to avoid awakening the “sleeping giant” is fast-closing, the scientists warned.
The team looked at how the EAIS behaved during warm periods in Earth’s past, and analysed existing studies to project how future emissions levels will take a toll across the coming centuries.
“A key lesson from the past is that the EAIS is highly sensitive to even relatively modest warming scenarios. It isn’t as stable and protected as we once thought,” said co-author Professor Nerilie Abram, from the Australian National University’s Research School of Earth Sciences.
“Achieving and strengthening our commitments to the Paris Agreement would not only protect the world’s largest ice sheet, but also slow the melting of other major ice sheets such as Greenland and West Antarctica, which are more vulnerable to global warming.”
Co-author Professor Matthew England, from the University of New South Wales, said that satellite observations already show signs of thinning ice and the retreat of the vast ice sheet, while Professor Matt King from the University of Tasmania said much more work was needed on East Antarctica.
“We understand the Moon better than East Antarctica. So, we don’t yet fully understand the climate risks that will emerge from this area,” Professor King said.
Professor Abram said that scientists once thought that East Antarctica was less vulnerable to the climate crisis than other polar regions - but that was no longer the case. Keeping the planet well below 2C is critical.
“This means the fate of the world’s largest ice sheet very much remains in our hands,” she added.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments