Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Animal feed to be given GM labelling

Oliver Tickell
Tuesday 26 October 1999 23:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A GM-labelling system is to be introduced for animal feeds sold in Britain to uphold consumers' right to choose, Nick Brown, the Minister of Agriculture, said yesterday.

A GM-labelling system is to be introduced for animal feeds sold in Britain to uphold consumers' right to choose, Nick Brown, the Minister of Agriculture, said yesterday.

Speaking in the Butchers' Hall at Smithfield, London, he said: "Animal feeds should be labelled as to whether or not they contain GM ingredients as it is a consumer right to have traceability through the food chain. I see a lot of potential benefit in GM technology but we have to win the consumer over and that will require openness and transparency."

He said he favoured three levels of label on feeds: a "strong" label such as "GM-free", which would identify feed that had passed a "very tough" regulatory test; a weaker label such as "non-GM", which would allow for a level of accidental contamination; and a GM-positive label if such ingredients were present.

"This is an important step," said Harry Hadaway, the Soil Association's campaigner on GM issues. "It is the first move towards giving consumers a proper choice in whether or not they are supporting the GM food industry when they eat animal products. It will also boost market demands for segregation of GM and non-GM ingredients in the food chain.

"Such a scheme would represent a significant advance for consumers and another major setback for the GM industry."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in