Watchdog criticises BDO and Mazars over ‘unacceptable’ audits
The Financial Reporting Council said there has been ‘some improvement’ across the sector.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Auditors BDO and Mazars have been called out for the “unacceptable” quality of their work by the accounting watchdog.
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) said there has been “some improvement” across the auditing sector amid heavy scrutiny following failings linked to the major collapses of firms such as Carillion.
FRC chief executive Sir John Thompson said its latest report highlighted that “consistent, long-term improvement” is still needed across the industry.
The FRC said the results of the inspections of BDO and Mazars audits “remain concerning” and outlined that it has developed specific supervisory firms in an effort to drive improvement.
Only half of Mazars’ eight audits were deemed of an acceptable quality.
The report also said that just seven of the 12 BDO audits inspected by officials were deemed good enough.
All five audits by fellow mid-tier firm Grant Thornton were deemed acceptable, although the firm was fined £1.3 million by the FRC earlier this week over failings in audits for Sports Direct.
Meanwhile, KPMG, which was singled out as a particularly poor performer in last year’s report, “significantly improved” although the regulator said it will still closely monitor the firm’s progress.
Overall, 75% of audits for all firms inspected by the watchdog were good or required limited improvement, rising from 71% in the previous year.
Sir Jon Thompson said: “While it is encouraging to see some improvement in audit quality at the largest audit firms, consistent, long-term improvement is still required across the market.
“We will monitor closely the potentially negative impact on the public interest that the de-risking by firms of challenging audits may have on audit quality.
“The FRC will continue to build on our assertive supervisory approach to ensure firms are consistently delivering high quality audit which will drive increased choice and resilience in the market over time.”