Tax expert questions whether PM’s capital gains tax arrangement should continue
Rishi Sunak’s tax return showed he paid a lower effective rate of tax than if his income had been mostly from employment.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Rishi Sunak is benefiting from a lower effective tax rate due to most of his earnings coming from capital gains rather than employment income, a tax expert has said.
Dan Neidle said it is a “very good question” whether the law should continue to allow capital gains to be taxed less than employment income.
It comes after the Prime Minister published his long-awaited tax documents on Wednesday, showing that he paid more than £1 million in UK tax over the previous three financial years on earnings totalling £4.7 million.
Mr Neidle, whose work helping to expose Nadhim Zahawi’s tax affairs resulted in the former Conservative Party chairman’s resignation, said Mr Sunak’s effective rate of tax was far lower than if the majority of those earnings had been made via employment.
The documents show that Mr Sunak made nearly £2 million through income and capital gains in 2021/22.
His income from dividends was £172,415, and from capital gains was £1.6 million.
For that same financial year, it showed that he paid £432,493 in tax.
Speaking to Sky News, Mr Neidle said the Prime Minister paying an effective rate of 22% is “not because he has done anything clever or because he is avoiding tax, it is because in this country we tax employment income at up to 47% but capital gains on investments at only 20%.
“That is why his effective rate is so low.
Weirdly, Mr Sunak, who benefits from that low rate, is also the man who has the power to change it
“Whether that is a fair result, whether the law should be like that, is a very good question.
“And, weirdly, Mr Sunak, who benefits from that low rate, is also the man who has the power to change it.”
The Prime Minister dodged a question about whether capital gains tax should be higher during a visit to North Wales.
He told broadcasters: “I said I would publish my tax returns. I was pleased to be able to do that yesterday in the interest of transparency.”
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has vowed to follow Mr Sunak’s example by publishing his tax return.
“Now the Prime Minister has published his, I will publish mine,” he said after giving a speech in Stoke-on-Trent on Thursday.
“I hope to be able to do that later on today, so that’s very straightforward.”
He too swerved a question on whether the capital gains tax rate should be reviewed, saying that the Prime Minister’s financial details are for “others” to analyse.
Former business secretary Jacob Rees-Mogg argued that Mr Sunak’s healthy earnings show him to be “the sort of person we want running our country”.
The senior Tory MP told TalkTV: “I think it is really good news that you have somebody of the ability and wealth-creating enterprise of Rishi Sunak as our Prime Minister.
“I think the fact he has £5 million of income is good news and should give us confidence in the calibre of people going into British politics.”
Most of Mr Sunak’s earnings related to a US-based investment fund listed as a blind trust, according to the summary.
Mr Neidle said it is designed to “avoid any conflict of interest”, meaning Mr Sunak will not see how his investments are being managed.
“This kind of blind arrangement, I don’t think anyone does it except politicians and it is not a term of art – there is no such legal thing as a blind trust,” he said.
“So exactly what they are legally is slightly fuzzy.”
Mr Sunak, who is regarded as among the richest inhabitants of Downing Street, first pledged to publish his tax returns during his unsuccessful campaign to become Tory leader last summer, in an attempt to put transparency at the heart of his bid.
He repeatedly promised to do so in recent months, and faced continued pressure to release the documents when it emerged that former cabinet minister Mr Zahawi settled an estimated £4.7 million bill with HM Revenue & Customs while he was chancellor.
Rather than a full tax return, No 10 published “a summary” of Mr Sunak’s UK taxable income, capital gains and tax paid as reported to HMRC, prepared by accountancy service Evelyn Partners.
Critics questioned the timing of the release, accusing No 10 of attempting to bury the tax statement under other headlines as it came on the same day as former prime minister Boris Johnson faced questioning over allegations that he misled Parliament about lockdown parties in Downing Street during the pandemic.
Political analyst Lord Hayward was non-committal when asked on Sky News whether Mr Sunak’s sizeable earnings will have an impact in the polls.
The Tory peer told Sky News: “It doesn’t come as a surprise that he is a rich man.”
He said inflation being found to have risen in February indicated that Mr Sunak, who has made slashing inflation by half a key goal of his premiership, will delay the next general election until October or November 2024.
Expectation had grown that the Prime Minister would call the next Westminster election, which can take place no later than the end of January 2025, in summer or even spring next year.