Sir James Dyson: Home-working affecting competitiveness of UK firms
The inventor urged the Government to take the ‘less popular decision’ and get workers back to offices to restore the ‘competitiveness’ of UK firms.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The “chances of the next generation will suffer” if British workers do not return to the office, Sir James Dyson has warned.
The billionaire inventor has called on the Government to take the “less popular decision” and lead workers away from their homes and back into offices in order to restore the “competitiveness” of the nation’s firms.
England’s order to work from home where possible was lifted on July 19, and the Government has said it expects and recommends a gradual return to workplaces over the summer.
However, Labour has previously called for flexible working to become the “new normal”, saying “the right to flexible working will change our economy and the world of work for the better”.
Writing for the Daily Telegraph Sir James said allowing flexible working on a long-term basis risks creating a “two-tier workforce”.
He wrote: “Glib statements from ministers about home-working being ‘here to stay’ show a lack of understanding of the detrimental impact that it is having. Where is their output-based evidence?
“We risk creating a two-tier workforce with those at home becoming less and less effective, leaving those diligently attending the workplace to drive the business forward.”
Sir James pointed to his own business as an example of how some firms are not suited for flexible working.
He highlighted his company’s development of a new ventilator during the initial outbreak of the pandemic, with a team of 400 coming together to build a new medical device from scratch.
“Projects like this could never work with people cocooned at home,” Sir James said.
He urged the Government to restore the right for companies to determine how best to organise their teams, adding: “The Government must now harness any ‘vaccine dividend’ and support Britain’s firms as they seek to recover their global competitiveness.
“Returning to the workplace is the essential starting point.”