Scottish Water accused of holding pay rise ‘to ransom’ by striking workers
The company said it was ‘dismayed’ its offer, which included an 8% pay rise, was not accepted.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Scotland’s Government-owned water company has been accused of holding workers’ pay rises “to ransom” as industrial action begins.
Hundreds of staff will walk out over the weekend in action that began on Friday, with strikes planned over 48 days in the next three months.
The disagreement stems from a new grading structure unions claim could cost the lowest paid up to £5,000 with Patricia McArthur, the Scottish Water branch secretary for the trade union Unison, saying workers were missing out on a pay increase by not agreeing to the plans.
The company’s chief operating officer Peter Farrer said he “regrets” that strike action has been taken, adding that the firm remained “committed” to striking a deal, with its most recent offer including an 8% pay rise.
New talks are scheduled for Wednesday after the most recent negotiations – which went on into the early hours of Thursday – failed.
Speaking to the PA news agency at the company’s waste water treatment plant in Shieldhall, Glasgow, Ms McArthur said: “We’re on strike because Scottish Water are basically holding our cost-of-living rise to ransom.
“They’re trying to force the staff to accept a new pay and grading system that’s not been collectively bargained by the unions and we have some serious concerns about the content of it.”
She added: “We are just looking to get a decent cost-of-living rise before Christmas, we’re looking to work with Scottish Water to try and come up with a pay and grading system that is going to be good for everyone.”
Ms McArthur went on to say that strike action was likely to cause issues in the water network as temperatures plunged to their lowest since April.
“We are teetering on the brink of a potential disaster for our network by going out on strike – we don’t want to do that,” she said.
“Scottish Water is the unseen utility – you don’t know it’s there, until it’s not.”
She added: “We’re really proud, we love our jobs, but it’s got to the point where we can’t afford not to strike.”
Mr Farrer sought to assure Scots that plans were in place to avert any issues with the water supply, saying: “We will do all we can to ensure customers do not experience any disruption to their water supplies and that treatment of the country’s waste water continues as usual, despite the industrial action.
We are dismayed the unions have taken this course of action over what, at 8% or more for all, is an exceptional proposal for our people and one of the best in the public sector
“A reliable water source is vital for everyone. Maintaining public health and protecting the environment are our priorities and it is the responsible course of action for us to have contingency plans ready.
“We are committed to maintaining our high levels of customer service during this dispute and are confident that those staff members who do not strike will be ready, willing and able to help ensure we do so.
“We are dismayed the unions have taken this course of action over what, at 8% or more for all, is an exceptional proposal for our people and one of the best in the public sector.”
Stephen Deans, a regional coordinating officer for the Unite union, said the fix would be “very simple”.
“This is one of the most simple and straightforward disputes I’ve ever been involved in in my career,” he said.
“It’ll take for the management to agree to honour collective bargaining with the trade unions in relation to their pay and grading system, it’s as simple as that.”
We absolutely want to work with Scottish Water to make sure that we get something that is better than what is there just now and something that works
Claire Greer, Scotland organiser at the GMB union, said the unions agree that the current pay and grading structure – which the company says is 21 years old – is “not fit for purpose”, but that any replacement should be devised in collaboration with staff.
“We absolutely want to work with Scottish Water to make sure that we get something that is better than what is there just now and something that works,” she said.
“What is on the table is not that, so we need to make sure that we work together and that the work that Scottish Water have already done in the background without the trade unions, if there is anything that we could use and we can progress from, then absolutely the unions are in complete agreement with that.”
The GMB, she said, has “many, many concerns” about the current proposals, including what they see as a lack of a process for workers to appeal against the grades they are in and for job evaluations, as well as the claim that workers’ pay was being benchmarked against companies like McDonalds and Amazon as opposed to other utility firms.