RMT’s Mick Lynch describes first meeting with Transport Secretary as ‘positive’
Rail strikes are planned for October 1, 5, and 8, threatening travel chaos for passengers.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.RMT general secretary Mick Lynch has described his first meeting with new Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan as a “good meeting with a positive attitude”.
Rail strikes are planned for October 1, 5, and 8, threatening travel chaos for passengers.
Just days after stepping into her new role, Ms Trevelyan met Mr Lynch.
Speaking to Sophy Ridge on Sky News on Sunday, Mr Lynch said that it was a “good meeting”.
“What we need to see from the new secretary of state is the ability to unblock the problems in the dispute,” he said.
If somebody wants to meet you and shakes your hand, that’s a positive start
“Her predecessor seemed to be putting obstacles in the way of everyone, including the employers, by shackling them to a mandate that was impossible to deliver.
“They were putting down issues that we could never accept, and the other trade unions could never accept.
“So I’ve asked the new secretary of state, and it was a good meeting with a positive attitude and a bit of goodwill, to try and unthaw this situation.
“We need to get the thing out of deep freeze and get it on the table so we can work through the problem.”
He added that Ms Trevelyan’s willingness to meet and shake hands was “the better way to conduct business”.
“If somebody wants to meet you and shakes your hand, that’s a positive start,” he said.
“It’s the better way to conduct business than than just slagging each other off, and that’s not what I’m into, and I hope that she’s not either.”
However, Mr Lynch was critical of the Government, describing the tightening of strike laws as “an attack on civil liberties and human rights”.
It comes after Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng put himself on a collision course with trade unions by announcing plans to legislate to require them to put pay offers from employers to a vote of members.
Amid a wave of industrial action by hundreds of thousands of workers, he told the Commons on Friday that it is “unacceptable” that strike action is causing so much disruption.
He added that other European countries had minimum service levels to stop “militant trade unions” closing down transport systems.
Mr Lynch said the reforms would make it impossible for trade unions to exist in the UK.
“Well they’re not just strike laws, they’re an attack on civil liberties and human rights,” he said.
“So they’ve tried to make it impossible for trade unions to exist in this country and they’re trying to make it impossible, in fact, for the people of this country to campaign against poverty, which is what many of them were changing.
“If there is no trade union freedom, and it’s impossible to conduct rules and industrial action, people will have to go in other ways, they will have to think of other means of doing it.”
He added that the Government say they want to cut red tape, but are subjecting the trade unions to more stringent regulation.
“They’re trying to regulate unions, and they’ve said they’re going to cut red tape,” he said.
“The only people that are going to be subject to stringent regulation are the trade unions, and they want to regulate the relationship between the union and its members. That’s not acceptable.
“People will always regret further oppression of trade union rights because we won’t be able to protest, we’ve got a new Police Bill that’s going to stop us protesting on streets.
“And we’re going to have a new set a trade union laws that attempt to stop us having a balanced equation in the workplace, and that’s not acceptable.”