Ministers made no concessions on social media encryption concerns, says Donelan
Previous reports suggested the Government had stepped back from an approach to encryption after critics said it would undermine users’ privacy online.
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Technology Secretary Michelle Donelan has denied ministers made any concessions on end-to-end encryption, amid a row with social media giants.
It comes as the Online Safety Bill returns to the Commons for its final stages, with MPs set to consider new amendments to the long-awaited legislation.
Earlier this month saw widespread reports that the Government had stepped back from an approach to encryption after critics said it would undermine users’ privacy online.
The Bill works in a way that strips out illegal content, forces social media companies to adhere to their own terms and conditions
End-to-end encryption is a security measure that protects data and communications by scrambling them, meaning only the sender and recipient are able to read the data.
It is widely used to safeguard sensitive information, with Signal and fellow messaging service WhatsApp among its high-profile users.
But Ms Donelan insisted on Tuesday that nothing had changed in the Bill and that ministers were not watering down plans, with the Online Safety Bill containing a “safety net” that “may never have to be used”.
“There has been a lot of confusion over what this is all about,” she told the PA news agency.
When it comes to children, we're saying (the companies have) got to enforce – making sure that no illegal content is there and also that legal but harmful content is not there either for children
Tech firms had said the provision would give the regulator the power to try to force the release of private messages on end-to-end encrypted communication services.
WhatsApp and other messaging services had warned they would look at pulling out of the UK rather than compromise people’s ability to communicate securely.
But a statement by digital minister Lord Parkinson in the Lords in September was seen by some as confirmation of the Government stepping back from a row with tech companies, with privacy campaigners claiming it as a partial victory.
The peer had told the Lords that regulator Ofcom would only issue a notice to companies “where technically feasible and where technology has been accredited as meeting minimum standards of accuracy in detecting only child sexual abuse and exploitation content”.
Ms Donelan denied that ministers had given ground.
“The Bill works in a way that strips out illegal content, forces social media companies to adhere to their own terms and conditions and also empowers adults. When it comes to children, we’re saying they’ve got to enforce – making sure that no illegal content is there and also that legal but harmful content is not there either for children,” she said.
“In terms of end-to-end encryption, when a platform about to encrypt or already has encrypted – if there were concerns then raised with the regulator that there was paedophilia or child abuse on there, then the regulator would have a conversation with that platform, see what mitigations they could put in place to adhere to the legislation.
“If none of that worked, we need a safety net built into this piece of legislation – and the safety net works by the regulator saying you now need to invest in technology that will allow you to maintain the privacy element of encryption, protect encryption, but also enable us to have access and find these criminals, these heinous individuals, these paedophiles, these stains on society.
“It may never have to be used. But we think it is important that we put that safety net in legislation.”
The Online Safety Bill could make it onto the statute books in a matter of weeks. On Tuesday, campaigners, sport stars and TV figures joined Ms Donelan in Downing Street to back the proposed legislation.
I knew it was going to happen. It is a movement and things do take time. Things are moving on, it is now 2023. And I am just so glad that everyone is on board with these and change is going to happen
TV personality Georgia Harrison, whose ex-partner Stephen Bear was jailed earlier this year for posting intimate footage of her on his OnlyFans account, was among those joining the Technology Secretary in Number 10.
Others attending included Georgia Kousoulou, a former star of ITV’s The Only Way Is Essex (Towie) and ex-England international footballer Fara Williams.
Ms Kousoulou, who said she had been a victim of severe trolling, told PA that waiting for the legislation had been frustrating but that she was hopeful it would make a difference to online safety.
“I knew it was going to happen. It is a movement and things do take time. Things are moving on, it is now 2023. And I am just so glad that everyone is on board with these and change is going to happen,” she said.
Speaking after the meeting, Ms Williams said that the Bill would be a “start”.
We will see some things happening immediately. From day one, the regulator will work with social media companies and will actively monitor how they are starting to implement the piece of legislation
“We’re not going to see a change straight away. Like with everything with safety, we have to implement things and it’s a process.”
Other attendees included presenter and author Emily Clarkson and former Love Island contestant Sharon Gaffka.
Ms Gaffka said: “I definitely believe it is long overdue. I can understand and sympathise with the Government that they’ve had political obstacles and legal obstacles to overcome to make the Bill as strong as it is.
“I don’t think change will happen overnight but I think it is a step in the right direction.”
In the Commons, technology minister Paul Scully told MPs that there was “no intention by the Government to weaken the encryption technology”.
But former minister Dame Caroline Dinenage, who chairs the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, said she was still a “little bit confused” about the Government’s stance.
“It sounds like the minister has acknowledged that there is no sufficiently accurate and privacy-preserving technology currently in existence and that the last resort power would only come into effect once the technology was there,” she said.