Judge refuses Amazon dismissal bid over delivery driver lawsuit
More than 2,000 drivers for the retail tech giant have joined legal action which could lead to it having to pay out hefty compensation.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An application by Amazon to strike out claims from drivers who believe they should be classed as employees has been refused by an employment tribunal.
More than 2,000 drivers for the retail tech giant have joined legal action which could lead to it having to pay out hefty compensation.
The action, brought by lawyers at Leigh Day, has seen drivers – who are currently classed as self-employed independent contractors – seeking holiday pay, the national minimum wage, the right to an employment contract, breach of contract and unauthorised deductions from wages.
The drivers currently make deliveries on behalf of Amazon via the companies’ “Delivery Service Partners”.
This is a huge success for the drivers we represent
As a result, Amazon has suggested the drivers have no possible course of action directly against the online retailer.
Lawyers have, however, brought the claims against Amazon, arguing that they are responsible because of the alleged close control and monitoring that the online retailer has over the delivery process.
Amazon applied to the tribunal to strike out all the claims against it on the basis that those claims have “no reasonable prospect of success”.
But after a two-day hearing, employment Judge F Spencer delivered a reserved judgment, stating: “While the various relationships may, at first sight, look like a simple outsourcing arrangement, in the absence of further information as to how the relationships work in practice, I cannot conclude either that the case against Amazon has no reasonable prospect, or that it has little reasonable prospect of success.”
We are committed to ensuring these drivers are fairly compensated by the delivery companies they work with and are treated with respect
Kate Robinson, a solicitor in Leigh Day’s employment team, said: “This is a huge success for the drivers we represent.
“Amazon is a multinational company and Leigh Day believes it is using a complex structure of arrangements to deny delivery drivers the employee rights we believe they should be entitled to.
“Leigh Day has always argued that, because of the reality of how the drivers work, including the standards drivers have to meet, and the way they fit into Amazon’s business, drivers are not genuinely self-employed independent contractors.”
A spokesman for Amazon said: “We’re hugely proud of the drivers who work with our partners across the country, getting our customers what they want, when they want, wherever they are.
“We are committed to ensuring these drivers are fairly compensated by the delivery companies they work with and are treated with respect, and this is reflected by the positive feedback we hear from drivers every day.”