Judge bars unlawful protests against Esso oil pipeline project
Mr Justice Julian Knowles on Thursday granted a ‘permanent injunction’ after an application by lawyers representing Esso.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A High Court judge has barred “unlawful protests” against an Esso oil pipeline project between Southampton and London.
Mr Justice Julian Knowles on Thursday granted a “permanent injunction” against a named protester, Scott Breen, and “persons unknown” after an application by lawyers representing Esso.
The judge, who had considered evidence at a High Court hearing in London, outlined his reasoning in a written ruling and referred to a “campaign of protest”.
Another judge had previously granted an interim injunction.
Mr Justice Knowles heard that the pipeline would stretch more than 60 miles (more than 100km) between Hampshire and a west London terminal in Hounslow when complete.
Esso said there had been 15 “incidents” which had “affected” the construction of the pipeline between December 2021 and August 2022.
Timothy Morshead KC, who led Esso’s legal team, had argued that there was a “continuing need” to “restrain unlawful protests”.
Mr Morshead said “activities carried out by some protesters” had gone “far beyond” what “might reasonably be regarded as lawful and peaceful” protest – and given rise “to serious health and safety concerns”.
He told the judge that the “risk of repetition” was “obvious”.
Mr Justice Knowles said he had taken into account protesters’ human rights to free speech and peaceful assembly and was “satisfied” that Esso was entitled to the injunction it sought.
“The campaign of protest which the pipeline has attracted is plainly intended to impede (Esso’s) ability to construct the pipeline and to harm it economically,” he said.
“Having considered the issues and the evidence, the balancing exercise I have performed comes down very clearly in (Esso’s) favour given the importance of the works and the threat posed by the protesters to disrupt and cause damage.”
The judge said neither Mr Breen nor any other protester had appeared at the hearing.
He heard that Esso operated a network of oil pipelines from its refinery in Fawley, near Southampton, to fuel terminals across England.