No evidence banks closed accounts due to ‘political views’, says review launched after Farage’s Coutts row
The Financial Conduct Authority said it will do more work to verify the data provided by banks and building societies
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
There is no evidence of banks denying politicians access to accounts over the last year due to their political views, a review by the regulator has said.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said the evidence it has gathered “suggests that no firm closed an account between July 2022 and June 2023 primarily because of a customer’s political views”.
It said it plans to work further with banks, building societies and payment companies to verify the data they supplied and better understand why and when they close accounts due to reputational risk.
The probe was launched in August after Coutts Bank decided to end its relationship with former Ukip leader Nigel Farage.
Mr Farage claimed the account was shut due to his political opinions.
The financial institution took into account the fact his mortgage would shortly be paid off and also discussed potential “reputational risk to the bank”, an internal document compiled by Coutts showed.
The FCA acknowledged on Tuesday it had gathered information “at speed” and said it will do more to “address gaps in the data”.
“While no bank, building society or payment firm reported to us that they had closed accounts primarily due to someone’s political views, further work is needed for us to be sure,” FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi said.
The FCA said it will focus on “outlier firms” when ensuring the data provided is accurate.
While no bank, building society or payment firm reported to us that they had closed accounts primarily due to someone’s political views, further work is needed for us to be sure
It will also look into why there are 1.1 million people in the UK who do not have a bank account and what kind of people fall into this category.
“As we undertake that work, the time is also right for a debate on how we balance access to bank accounts with the threat of financial crime, as well as firms’ reasonable risk and commercial appetites,” Mr Rathi said.
“An important question for policymakers is whether all individuals, businesses and organisations should have the right to an account, as is the case in some other countries.
An important question for policy makers is whether all individuals, businesses and organisations should have the right to an account, as is the case in some other countries
“What’s more, international comparisons suggest robust digital identities could play an important role not only in countering financial crime but also in aiding financial inclusion.”