Boohoo blasts Revolution Beauty after it defies shareholder vote
The spat between the two retailers intensified as Revolution Beauty’s shares surged after returning to trading.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Boohoo has accused Revolution Beauty of behaving inappropriately after it defied a shareholder vote at an eventful annual general meeting (AGM) on Tuesday.
The spat between the two retailers intensified as Revolution Beauty’s shares surged more than 50%, after a suspension on trading in place since September was lifted.
Fashion retailer Boohoo, which owns a 26.6% stake in the beauty brand, attempted to oust its bosses at the AGM by voting against the re-appointment of three senior directors to the board.
Votes against the re-elections secured more than 73%, but remaining independent director Jeremy Schwartz opted to defy the vote and reinstall the team afterwards.
It means Bob Holt remains as chief executive, Elizabeth Lake as finance chief, and Derek Zissman as chairman.
Mr Schwartz said his decisions were “not taken lightly” but that he acted to restore Revolution Beauty’s shares to the AIM stock exchange, which have been suspended from trading since last year following an auditing probe.
Boohoo fails to see how such a board can claim to be acting in the best interests of shareholders, and is instead self-serving, as demonstrated by its actions over the last 24 hours
But Boohoo blasted the move as “self-serving”, voicing “serious concerns” over the group’s conduct following the AGM.
“Boohoo fails to see how such a board can claim to be acting in the best interests of shareholders, and is instead self-serving, as demonstrated by its actions over the last 24 hours.
“This will likely result in significant remuneration and share awards for members of a self-elected board at the lifting of the suspension of trading in its shares, which Boohoo was pleased to hear is imminent.”
After Revolution Beauty’s shares resumed trading on Wednesday morning, its share price rocketed by more than 50%.
Its senior management team were subsequently granted share options to “reward them for the hard work done” and for improving the group’s sales, it said.
Boohoo said it wants the company to reconvene to honour the shareholder vote and appoint its own directors to the board, and “not to resort to further attempts to obstruct shareholders”.
It is understood the retailer is also appealing to the AIM stock market and the financial regulator following the AGM events.
Another shareholder meeting is due to be held later in the summer.