Words: blather, n. and v.

Christopher Hawtree
Monday 13 December 1999 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WHY DO newspapers assume readers are interested by launch parties, wherever they might be held? I have just caught up with the new magazine Talk: it might improve but, for now, the title should be Blather.

Its contending origins suggest that chat ran from Finland to Rome. From the Latin blaterare came blatter, hence blather, current since the early 19th century; also, perhaps, a variant of blether, from an Old Norse noun for nonsense. For a time, blither was synonymous but is now an intensifer: a blithering idiot need not be vocal.

While blather is the southern and American usage, blether obtains in the North and Scotland, where blather can mean bladder: a fine name for a rag-mag.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in