VISUAL ART: EXIT POLL: What gallery-goers think of Chuck Close at the Hayward

Saturday 24 July 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NAME PETER CLOVE

AGE 72

It's quite stunning. I've never heard of this guy and I haven't seen this form of art before. It's brilliant. The early works are a remarkable feat but I can't really see it as art. But the collages are amazing and reality becomes bolder and you get more out of it than you could possibly get out of photos or drawings.

NAME YUVAL HAVKIN

AGE 24

I'm so impressed at his technique, but it's a little boring to start with - I can see a photograph whenever I want. But the development into collage is fascinating because each piece is only one colour. It's a completely new technique to me.

NAME KEVIN CAMPLING

AGE 46

My humble opinion is that it's too systematic. It's all technique, and it's an old technique as well. It reminds you of computerised images, or of newsprint blown up, which lessens the effect of it a bit for me.

NAME GILLIAN COUSINS

AGE 49

I thought his work was incredible, particularly the abstraction, which is what an artist always does: start with a conventional image and then look into it so closely that you're just looking at surfaces, textures and light. The first works seem more than real, partly because of the size.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in