TELEVISION / BRIEFING: One foot in the present, too

Gerard Gilbert
Thursday 03 June 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

On Friday nights, presumably, Prince Charles takes the phone off the hook and settles down for a night in front of the telly. Not only can he catch up with the latest state of his unmarriage in What the Papers Say, there is also Channel 4's Garden Club and, now, ONE FOOT IN THE PAST (9.30pm BBC2), a magazine devoted to Britain's ancient bricks and mortar - or 'heritage' as they say in Tory think-tank circles. Omnipresenter Kirsty Wark (in Scotland you can wear out your remote control finding a programme not fronted by her) anchors the show, which is actually a lot more than just restored mining villages and Brideshead Revisited revisited. It takes a left-field, Lucinda Lamptonesque line on what is of value in our landscape, whether it be the Emley Moor television tower in Yorkshire or Beryl Bainbridge sharing her favourite view (the gas-works behind King's Cross Station). Architectural journalist Dan Cruikshank goes in search of the Euston Arch, whose removal in 1962 kick-started the modern conservation movement, while Loyd Grossman gets the kitsch assignment, looking at the effect of pebble dash and stone-cladding on once dignified Victorian house fronts.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in