World War Three: Inside the War Room, TV review: A hypothetical 'hot war' was compelling, if not terrifying, viewing
The War Room was faced with a scenario that has haunted strategists since civil war broke out in Ukraine: potential Russian military involvement in Latvia and Estonia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Some of Britain's senior military, political and diplomatic figures came together to discuss a hypothetical "hot war" in World War Three: Inside the War Room.
The War Room, including former British Ambassador to the US Sir Christopher Meyer, was faced with a scenario that has haunted strategists since civil war broke out in Ukraine: potential Russian military involvement in Latvia and Estonia. Like Ukraine, these countries have sizable Russian-speaking minorities, but unlike Ukraine they are members of Nato, whose founding treaty states that an attack on one ally is an attack on all.
It started out as quite a dull discussion but as the hypothetical situation escalated – and boy did it escalate quickly – it fast became compelling, if not terrifying, viewing. Phrases like "intensive diplomatic effort", "nuclear blackmail" and "offensive operation" were bandied about and it wasn't long before, in this alternative reality, Russia detonated a nuclear weapon.
It was a little clichéd – the Russians were the bad guys, the UK set lots of deadlines but ultimately wouldn't commit to any action and the US went in all guns (or nuclear weapons) blazing – but then clichés are always clichés for a reason.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments