George Clarke's Amazing Spaces, TV review: Hare-brained builders learn a few home truths in this superior property show

 

Ellen E. Jones
Friday 06 June 2014 00:32 BST
Comments
Grass act: George Clarke (right) with Olly and Tamsin from Bolton
Grass act: George Clarke (right) with Olly and Tamsin from Bolton (Channel 4)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

George Clarke's Amazing Spaces (Channel 4) is superior to the other property shows because it isn't really a property show at all; it's a people show. The architect-builder-cum-TV presenter's true subject is the kind of ambitious eccentric who would never let a lack of funds, or a law of physics get in the way of a hare-brained building scheme.

People like Bolton-based Olly and Tamsin, who want to build a half-underground, half-above ground "magical family hideaway" at the end of their garden.

Clarke is embarking on a garden transformation project of his own this series, so the couple are an inspiration to him, as they should be to us all. While 80 per cent of Britons have access to a garden, we only spend an average of a week a year enjoying our outdoor space.

There's not much that can be done about this country's washout summers, but with an understanding of planning laws, an outdoors structure like Olly and Tamsin's "warren" (as they call it) is possible. Assuming you have a spare five grand stashed in the shed somewhere, that is.

Olly said at the outset he envisioned coming in under budget at just £1,000 – how the gods laughed! He and Tamsin also seemed to think that building an underground structure was simply a matter of digging a big hole. It was Clarke's job to gently explain the concept of effective drainage, as the three stood knee-deep in a pool of mud.

But such are the setbacks in any truly visionary endeavour. The first attempted build of Kent couple Barry and Deleck was similarly slapdash. In retrospect, it's lucky last year's big storm hit while their bespoke teardrop trailer was still under construction. Imagine if they'd been sleeping in it when the wind ripped it apart like a child with Christmas present.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in