Don't Panic: How To End Poverty in 15 Years, TV review: Why didn't we hear from the rich?
Swedish pop-star statistician Hans Rosling presented a cross between an extended TED Talk, election night and a Comic Relief human-story segment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The small matter of ending “extreme poverty” by 2030 – measured as those living on less than $1.25 a day – realistically, is not one that can be solved in an hour of primetime telly. Yet Hans Rosling, the Swedish pop-star statistician gave it a good go in his inimitable style. His upbeat conclusion that the first newly drawn-up development goal is indeed possible, even “easy”, was an uplifting thought on a grey autumn day - if over-simplified in this package.
This show was made to tie-in with the UN’s new development targets and was in the same vein as 2013’s Don’t Panic - The Truth About Population, with a more over-blown premise. But Rosling convinced with his combo of a presentation of colourful bubble graphs and props interspersed with pre-filmed human stories. The effect was a cross between an extended TED Talk – the format that made his name – combined with election night and a Comic Relief human-story segment.
Rosling’s shtick is making the complex seem mind-numbingly simple, delivered with humour.
“We Swedes are quite good at self-assemble furniture,’ he said wheeling on a giant graph to illustrate how poverty levels had changed. I think it needed the pre-filmed segments to bring the ideas to life - like the family for whom a bad harvest led to ‘Hunger Season’, where they only ate once a day. We saw how the likes of water pumps and electric bikes could lift families out of poverty, whereas an expected medical bill could send them spiralling back down.
I was waiting to hear from the rich, but they didn’t get a look in. There is only so much you can do in an hour, after all. Rosling’s conclusions: “right actions, economic growth and better-focussed aid” were broad-brush solutions, but he made them sound possible - for 60 minutes at least.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments