Britain's Bloodiest Dynasty, TV review: Dan Jones's series has turned history into an episode of Game of Thrones

 

Ellen E. Jones
Friday 28 November 2014 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A feminist Eccles cake and a cup of tea – what better accompaniment to the enjoyably lightweight documentary Britain's Bloodiest Dynasty on Channel 5?

There's nothing wrong with turning British history into a family drama – Shakespeare did it, after all – yet historian Dan Jones's four-part series about the Plantagenets still runs the risk of being dismissed by purists, especially as it comes so soon after Professor Robert Bartlett's authoritative BBC2 programme.

What with all the buzz words in Jones's narration and the flashy reconstructions of Henry II's court, this series hasn't just turned history into any drama, it's turned it into an episode of Game of Thrones.

That's no bad thing for us GoT fans, although the trendy turn of phrase grew a little wearing. As Jones told it, Henry had never meant to order the murder of his "drinking buddy" Thomas Becket at Canterbury Cathedral, he was "just venting" and when "outrage at this sacrilege went viral" he was duly horrified.

Jones's point was that Henry's ill-chosen words have caused his achievements to be overlooked by history. It would be a shame if the same fate befell this otherwise entertaining series.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in