Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.No one's done much to help the residents of James Turner Street in Birmingham, now forever rechristened Benefits Street, thanks to Channel 4's controversial new documentary series. Despite – or maybe because of – the Twitter death threats, accusations of betrayal and media uproar, which followed its first broadcast, Channel 4 has defied calls for the series to be pulled. Did it hope this second episode would change some minds?
This week, the focus had broadened to include less divisive characters. There was pensioner Sue, a long-term resident, who had entered her street in the Britain in Bloom competition in hopes of restoring some front gardens to their former glory, and Anna, a Polish Mormon engaged to marry an Algerian Muslim.
Every Ukip voter's worst nightmare lurked behind the front door of Number 151, however: 14 immigrant workers from Romania squeezed into a house built for a family of four. "They could make at least two and a half grand a day, they can," said one neighbour with a sage nod towards the house. Try £10 a day for 17 hours of work.
After hearing the complaints made about it by the very people who appear on screen, it's impossible to watch this programme without scepticism, but this episode was an improvement on the last. At least here there were some attempts to challenge myths and confront prejudices about society's most marginalised people, instead of lazily reinforcing them. Whether that makes up for the misleading title and the unpleasant insinuations of the voiceover is another matter.