REVIEW / Extended plugging expressly forbidden

Tom Sutcliffe
Wednesday 22 December 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE BBC has taken advertising for some time now. It's diplomatically disguised in most cases, naturally; a 'documentary' on the making of a Hollywood blockbuster, say, which plugs a hole in the schedules while also plugging the movie or those mysterious cases in which a director suddenly conceives a passion for shots of

an airliner taking off and landing. But with Omnibus's (BBC 1) film about Andrew Lloyd Webber's Sunset Boulevard the slow capitulation to advertainment hit a new low.

You had to be watching closely to spot the hard fact - the credit that revealed that this extended puff for the latest product from the Really Useful Company had actually been made by the Really Useful Picture Company was in shamefacedly small print. But the preceding 50 minutes might have hinted to you that something was amiss. A bland concoction of extracts and explanations, it had all the cerebral bite of those glossy souvenir booklets touted in theatre foyers. At one point, surreally, Ronald Reagan was wheeled on to hymn the qualities of William Holden in the original film, an animatronic performance which revealed that the programme wasn't even discriminating about which stars it sucked up to.

Not that it was entirely devoid of critical content. 'It's one of the great roles of classic proportions,' observed the actress Glenn Close about Norma Desmond, the role she herself plays in the Los Angeles production. 'The lyrics have a kind of sophistication that maybe I haven't had in a while,' Lloyd Webber noted trenchantly. 'I suppose there is a danger of sentimentalising a great film noir . . .' Trevor Nunn conceded, before explaining that, naturally, they had avoided this.

Plenty of excuses will have flown around the corridors at Television Centre to justify this shabby stuff. Number one was probably: 'Oh, but everybody does it.' True. The new season of The South Bank Show (ITV) includes a programme on Dawn French which is to be made by Saunders and French Ltd. But LWT is a commercial company, not a public service broadcaster. The obligation on the BBC to take programmes from independent production companies has made it far more difficult to police any sort of corporate ruling in this area but it's still surprising that they're not more protective of the values on which the licence fee will stand or fall.

Excuse number two may have been: 'But we wouldn't have got his co-operation any other way.' True. There was so much music in last night's film that you could sell it as a greatest hits compilation without running any real danger of infringing the Trades Descriptions Act. Without Lloyd Webber's agreement that would simply have been impossible.

All these are just excuses, though, not justifications. It is one thing to eke out the BBC's limited budget with cheap buy-ins which help to fill the schedules in the small hours, quite another to compromise the critical independence of your flagship arts programme in order to secure popular material. Even if last night's Omnibus had been a masterpiece it would have been a dubious exercise, but it wasn't - it was a programme the BBC should be ashamed of having transmitted.

A few weeks ago the BBC issued the latest copy of its Producers' Guidelines, a document that makes for wry reading in the light of last night's broadcast. 'Programmes should never give the impression that they are endorsing any product, service, or company,' it declares robustly. 'A product or service must never be included in sound or vision in return for cash, services, or any consideration in kind. This is product placement and is expressly forbidden in BBC programmes.' It looks as though it's already time for a

re-draft.

If the BBC is going to surrender all notion of a distinction between itself and the commercial channels, somebody had better explain to producers that it is far more lucrative if the person doing the selling pays the television station - rather than the other way around.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in