TV Advert showing Pamela Anderson covered in cream banned for being 'sexist and degrading' to women
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A television advert featuring actress Pamela Anderson wearing a bikini and covered in cream has been banned for being sexist and degrading to women.
The advert for domain and web hosting company Dreamscape Networks showed Anderson as a company boss chairing a meeting of men before her assistant poured cream into a cup of coffee while displaying her cleavage.
One of the men present was then shown to be fantasising about Anderson and her assistant dancing in bikinis while covered in cream, with a shot of Anderson calling out for the man in a suggestive manner.
Anderson snapped the man out of his fantasy by calling his name in a stern tone before the final scene showed her assistant revealing her cleavage again while pouring another cup of coffee.
The ad was cleared with a restriction that it should not be broadcast before 9pm.
Four viewers complained that the ad was offensive because the considered it to be sexist and degrading to women.
Dreamscape Networks said it believed the ad was "anything but degrading to women", deliberately portraying Anderson and her assistant as "attractive, dynamic and confident business people".
It said the ad took a tongue-in-cheek approach to promoting its product, adding that it believed that the majority of viewers would find it "fanciful and humorous".
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said it understood that the ad was intended to be a humorous and light-hearted parody of a mundane business meeting.
But it said the female characters were portrayed sexually throughout the ad, not just during the fantasy sequence, noting that their shirts were open to expose their bras and cleavages.
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
And it said the fantasy scene, although limited to the man's imagination, gave the impression that he viewed his female colleagues as sexual objects.
The ASA said: "Because of that, we considered the ad was likely to cause serious offence to some viewers on the basis that it was sexist and degrading to women."
It ruled that the ad must not be broadcast again in its current form.
PA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments