Sinclair shares anti-CNN video across all its news sites
The YouTube clip attacks the news organisation for what it calls 'dishonesty and hyprocrisy' in its reporting on Sinclair
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Sinclair Broadcast Group has posted links to a YouTube video which attacks CNN on the websites of its local affiliates.
The Sinclair-produced video, linked to the websites for WBFF, WNUV, and WUTB, bears the title: "Did CNN attack Sinclair for doing exactly what CNN has done for years?"
The broadcasting company, which owns more than 170 US TV stations, recently came under fire after reportedly ordering its presenters to claim that the media was behaving in a way that was "extremely dangerous to democracy", echoing Donald Trump's own attacks on "fake news".
This new video now launches an attack on CNN for what it calls "dishonesty and hypocrisy" in its reporting on Sinclair's actions, featuring clips of CNN reporter Brian Stelter in 2016 and 2017 warning about the spread of "fake news", attempting to equate his comments with Sinclair's own broadcast messages.
However, what Sinclair's video fails to address is how the meaning has shifted: with Trump latching onto genuine concerns about the spread of hoax stories by little-known websites planted on social media specifically to influence voters during the 2016 election and turning the phrase into an attack on mainstream media.
The original promos, which began airing two weeks ago, are part of a campaign by Sinclair to warn of the dangers of "one-sided news stories plaguing our country" and have been met with widespread criticism.
The producer of a morning show on a TV station in Nebraska owned by Sinclair resigned over the mandated messages, known as "must-runs" amongst local producers, adding: "This is almost forcing local news anchors to lie to their viewers. Making the local anchors do this was a big concern for me. I didn't go into news to give people biased information."
Donald Trump rushed to Sinclair's defence, writing on Twitter that the organisation was "far superior" to the like of CNN and NBC.
Sinclair released a statement in reaction to criticism which read: "We aren’t sure of the motivation for the criticism, but find it curious that we would be attacked for asking our news people to remind their audiences that unsubstantiated stories exist on social media, which result in an ill-informed public with potentially dangerous consequences."
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
"It is ironic that we would be attacked for messages promoting our journalistic initiative for fair and objective reporting, and for specifically asking the public to hold our newsrooms accountable. Our local stations keep our audiences’ trust by staying focused on fact-based reporting and clearly identifying commentary."
The Sinclair Broadcasting Group has been contacted for comment.
Follow Independent Culture on Facebook for all the latest on Film, TV, Music, and more.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments