Naya Rivera’s ex-husband files wrongful death lawsuit, claims lake has ‘deadly history’
Lawsuit was filed on behalf of their five-year-old son who was on board the boat when Rivera went missing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Naya Rivera's former husband Ryan Dorsey has filed a wrongful death lawsuit following the actor’s death in July.
Rivera's body was found on 13 July after the 33-year-old went missing from a rented pontoon boat on the California lake, where she was swimming with her then four-year-old son five days earlier. Soon after, an autopsy confirmed that the Glee star had drowned by accident.
The lawsuit was filed on Tuesday (17 November) by Dorsey on behalf of their son Josey Hollis, reports US Weekly.
Dorsey – to whom Rivera was married between 2014 and 2018 – filed a civil complaint that names Ventura County and the area’s water management district as defendants.
The court papers claim that Lake Piru – where the actor drowned – has a “deadly history”, citing at least 26 other drowning deaths since its opening in 1959.
It states that the authorities had not warned Rivera about the many dangers, claiming that there were no signs on the lake’s property warning visitors of strong currents, low visibility or strong winds.
The suit also alleges that the pontoon boat she rented was “illegally under-equipped” in terms of safety. It states that a later inspection revealed that the boat did not have any floatation or life-saving devices. California law requires all pontoon boats longer than 16ft to carry floatation devices on board.
The boat was also allegedly not equipped “with a safely accessible ladder, adequate rope, an anchor, a radio or any security mechanism to prevent swimmers from being separated from their boats”.
The lawsuit requests a trial by jury.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments