Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Kiefer Sutherland defends 24’s use of torture: ‘24 is your excuse for Abu Ghraib? You must be kidding me’

‘To use a television show as a scapegoat for the behaviour of the United States military is just absolutely asinine,’ actor told The Independent

Ellie Harrison
Saturday 22 January 2022 06:30 GMT
Comments
Sutherland on 24 film

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Kiefer Sutherland has dismissed claims that his hit show 24 endorsed the use of torture, saying it is “absolutely asinine” to blame the US military’s actions on a TV series.

Sutherland played counter-terrorist agent Jack Bauer in the show from 2001 to 2009, and reprised the role for a revival in 2014.

The thriller was a huge hit, winning 20 Emmys and drawing in a global audience of 100 million viewers.

However, the series was also criticised for promoting the idea that torture is an effective interrogation tactic.

In it, Bauer breaks suspects’ fingers, suffocates them and electrocutes them.

In November 2006, US Army Brigadier General Patrick Finnegan, the dean of the United States Military Academy at West Point, visited the set of 24 to complain that the show was having a toxic effect on his new recruits. “I’d like them to stop,” Finnegan said at the time. “They should do a show where torture backfires.”

In a new interview with The Independent, out on Saturday 22 January, Sutherland defended the show, saying: “If the United States military can be derailed by a television show, we’ve got a much bigger problem than 24.

“The second he made the comment public, as if somehow 24 was going to become your excuse for Abu Ghraib… you must be kidding me. That I won’t accept.

“To use 24, a television show, as a scapegoat for the behaviour of the United States military is just absolutely asinine.”

During the early stages of the Iraq War, members of the United States Army and the CIA committed a series of human rights violations and war crimes against detainees in the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, including torture and rape.

Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days

New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled

Try for free
Apple TV+ logo

Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days

New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled

Try for free

The abuses came to public attention with the emergence of photographs of the abuse in April 2004.

Elsewhere in the interview, Sutherland talks about his activist mother, his time behind bars and why 24 is unfairly maligned.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in