Historical writer Tom Holland attacks BBC's Wolf Hall for being 'a wee bit boring'
'Cromwell cared nothing for the truth. He was a fanatic,' says the author of 'Persian Fire'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A leading historical writer has attacked the BBC’s adaptation of the Hillary Mantel book Wolf Hall as “a wee bit boring”.
Wolf Hall tells the story of the rise of Thomas Cromwell under Henry VIII in the 16th century.
Tom Holland, author of the award-winning Rubicon: The Triumph and Tragedy of the Roman Republic, Persian Fire and In the Shadow of the Sword, said on Twitter: “Catching up with WolfHall, I can't help but think it's just a wee bit boring.”
And he added: “WolfHall is v beautiful and Mark Rylance [as Cromwell] is predictably compelling - but without Mantel's voice the story is just too familiar to be gripping.”
He criticised the show after the story was attacked for being anti-Catholic propaganda by Andrew M Brown writing in the Telegraph.
“Mantel wants to rescue Cromwell from his bad reputation and tell his story, which is all very well, but she does distort the truth,” he said.
“What we get is a sort of propaganda, just as the 16th-century pro-Protestant Foxe’s Book of Martyrs was.”
He highlighted last week’s episode in which Cromwell tells Henry “the monasteries were riddled with corruption – and he hadn’t come to this view through prejudice, he insisted, but from his own observation”.
“That is untrue: there were abuses, but we know that monasteries were much valued as centres of pilgrimage and sources of spiritual help as well as education and health care,” Mr Brown wrote.
“But Cromwell cared nothing for the truth. He was a fanatic. He and his agents made up revolting lies about monks which they spread in lip-smacking pornographic pamphlets, notably The Black Book.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments