Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Clare Balding to wed civil partner Alice Arnold

 

Daisy Wyatt
Wednesday 06 February 2013 11:24 GMT
Comments
Clare Balding with her civil partner Alice Arnold, who she hopes to wed
Clare Balding with her civil partner Alice Arnold, who she hopes to wed (Rex)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Clare Balding’s partner Alice Arnold has said the couple plan to marry after the gay marriage bill was passed last night.

Arnold, a broadcaster who entered into a civil partnership with Balding in 2006, said: “We will [get married] because we don’t want our relationship to exist in inverted commas. That one word MARRIED is crucial because it defines our relationship. The way we see ourselves and the way we wish others to see us.”

Rebutting some of the arguments made by MPs last night that marriage should only be between heterosexual couples, Arnold said: “The church does not own the institution of marriage. It is a civil right. Two thirds of couples do not get married in a church and if marriage is based on the procreation of children then why was it important to Prince Charles and Camilla, or indeed anybody over childbearing age.”

Writing in The Telegraph, she also argued against the idea that legalising gay marriage will “undermine” the institution of marriage. “Gay people do not seek to devalue marriage we seek to celebrate it. We want to play our role in society, we want to feel accepted and included. We want to contribute and most of all we want to be equal.”

Arnold spoke about the atmosphere of “fear and misunderstanding” surrounding Clause 28 introduced by Margaret Thatcher, saying “young people took their own lives as a result and we all have to live with that,” but hailed last night’s vote.

“I believe we will look back on last night as a defining moment when we broke through a wall of inequality and prejudice. David Cameron will not be vilified for this...he will be celebrated," she said.

“In an article on the Conservative Home website J P Floru says: 'In every country which introduced gay marriage it stopped being an issue the day after.'

“This is the day after.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in