Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Making a Murderer subject Brendan Dassey appeal case denied by Supreme Court

He maintains that the police coerced him into confessing to a crime he did not commit

Jacob Stolworthy
Tuesday 23 October 2018 09:18 BST
Comments
Making A Murderer trailer

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Supreme Court has refused to hear the appeal case of one of the subjects of Netflix true-crime series Making a Murderer.

Brendan Dassey's plea for a lower court ruling contended his conviction of involvement in the 2005 murder of Teresa Halbach claiming that the police coerced him into confessing.

28-year-old Dassey, who was 16 at the time of the murder, told Manitowoc County officers that he had helped his uncle, Steven Avery, rape and murder the freelance photographer after being interrogated four times in 48 hours.

He is currently serving life imprisonment for murder, sexual assault and mutilation of a corpse in connection with Halbach's death.

CNN reports that Dassey's lawyers have maintained that his constitutional rights were violated adding that he was convicted based solely on the confession and with no physical evidence. Court papers included accusations against his interrogators of feeding him the “right” answers despite displaying “significant intellectual and social limitations.”

Despite this, a panel of judges ruled against Dassey's appeal maintaining that he spoke “freely” when confessing to the crime.

His attorney, Laura Nirider, has vowed to “continue to fight for Brendan and the many other children who have been wrongfully convicted due to the use of coercive interrogation tactics.”

Nirider added: “Unfortunately, Brendan isn't alone. Over the past 20 years, extensive empirical and psychological research has shown that children under 18 are between three and four times more likely to falsely confess than adults - and yet the criminal justice system fails many of them. It's up to the courts to put an end to this.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in