Michael Jackson accusers interviewed by Oprah in emotional TV special After Neverland
The special, which also aired on Winfrey's OWN network, saw the host sit down with Wade Robson and James Safechuck
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.After Leaving Neverland, the two-part documentary detailing allegations of sexual abuse by Michael Jackson, had concluded on HBO, the network aired an hour-long special featuring Oprah Winfrey.
Oprah Winfrey Presents: After Neverland, which also aired on Winfreyâs OWN network, saw the host sit down with the two accusers featured in the documentary â Wade Robson and James Safechuck â and director Dan Reed.
The studio audience consisted of sexual abuse survivors, alongside their supporters and family members. Winfrey, who has previously spoken about being sexually abused when she was young, praised Reedâs documentary for depicting the reality behind sexual abuse.
âI know people all over the world are going to be in an uproar and debating whether or not Michael Jackson did these things and whether these two men are lying or not lying,â she said. âBut for me, this moment transcends Michael Jackson. It is much bigger than any one person. This is a moment in time that allows us to see this societal corruption, itâs like a scourge on humanity.... if it gets you, our audience, to see how it happens, then some good would have come of it.â
Winfrey explained that children struggle to articulate abuse to their parents because they lack the language to communicate their experiences, as they have been âseduced and entrappedâ.
Robson said that, as a child, he had âno understanding that what Michael did to me sexually was abuse. I had no concept of it being that.â
He added: âFrom night one of the abuse, of the sexual stuff that Michael did to me, he told me it was love. He told me that he loved me and God brought us together... anything Michael would say to me was gospel.â
âMichael drilled in you, âIf youâre caught, weâre caught, your life is over, my life is over,ââ Safechuck said. âItâs repeated over and over again, itâs drilled into your nervous system. It takes a lot of work to sort through that.â
Robson said that it was only when he had a son of his own, and began to learn about how children think, that he started to process his experiences through the lens of abuse.
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. ÂŁ8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. ÂŁ8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Jacksonâs family and his estate have publicly denounced the documentary, and branded Safechuck and Robson as âopportunistsâ and âadmitted liarsâ. In a lawsuit against HBO, the Jackson estate called the documentary a âone-sided marathon of unvetted propaganda to shamelessly exploit an innocent man no longer here to defend himselfâ.
When Winfrey questioned Reed as to why he chose not to interview any members of the Jackson family, he replied: âThis is a film thatâs not about Jackson. Itâs about what happened to Wade and James.â He added that no one in the family âdisputesâ that Jackson spent nights with young boys.
He continued: âWhatâs the journalistic value of interviewing someone who says, âWell, Michaelâs a really nice guy, he would never do anything to a child.â? Especially when they have a financial, vested interest in smearing and discrediting these men.â
Robson and Safechuck both have lawsuits against Jacksonâs estate that were dimissed but are under appeal. Robson said he wanted to get the attention of the estate, adding: â With this horrible thing that happened to me, what could I do that could maybe turn it into something good?â
âMichael trained me and forced me to tell the lie for so many years, particularly on the stand, really traumatizing experiences for me that had a huge impact on the rest of my life,â he said. âI wanted to get on the stand again because now Iâm able to tell the truth.â