Who's afraid of Virginia Woolf, Old Vic, Bristol

Martial hearts

Toby O'Connor Morse
Wednesday 06 March 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IT IS not generally known as a feel-good play. Yet it would be a shame if the desolate reputation of Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? should discourage audiences from making their way to the Old Vic. There is something wonderfully satisfying in seeing a grown-up modern classic performed with such thought and attention to detail, and with a recognition that what lies beneath the surface of the script is far more interesting than a simple display of marital martial arts.

This is not a production that has the director's fingerprints all over it. With his scrupulous care for the minutiae, Gareth Machin is developing a niche for himself as a crafter of precision work in which the director's hand is almost invisible, yet absolutely crucial. This staging has not a hair out of place. Combined with a lyrical script, what transpires on stage is almost too perfect. As a result, the audience are never quite drawn out of their role as observers and into the heart of this domestic Armageddon. By thus avoiding the squirm factor that a more "real" portrayal would induce, they can revel in the strength of the performances and the beauty of Albee's writing. Machin's production transfixes rather than discomfits and is more enjoyable for it.

The delicate staging is aided by some intelligent interpretation. George is often portrayed as a nebbish, an ineffectual cipher who lives up to Martha's description of him as "a zero". But not in Gerard Murphy's hands. His George is a man who has chosen not to try, rather than one who has tried and failed. There is a strength in his embittered acceptance of a life more ordinary, and he tolerates his shrewish wife rather than being downtrodden by her. As a result, Clare Higgins's Martha – an attention-seeking hysteric with an accent that is a little too Queens for a New England college president's daughter – flutters like an irascible moth round the glow of George's quiet anger.

Rather than suggesting a couple who won't acknowledge that their marriage is a sham, their performances bring out the fact that much of what passes between George and Martha is merely the "fun and games" that many married couples play. Higgins and Murphy succeed in communicating not only the vitriol on the surface of the marriage, but also the strange, twisted love between them. This production suggests that, buried in Albee's drama, there is a love story trying to get out. Maybe it is a feel-good play after all.

To Sat (0117-987 7877)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in