Whistle Down The Wind, Palace Theatre, London <!-- none onestar twostar fourstar fivestar -->

Paul Taylor
Wednesday 29 March 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Andrew Lloyd Webber's musical version of Whistle Down the Wind ran out of puff at the box office in January 2001 after only two-and-a-half years. Sporting his director's as well as his producer's hat, Bill Kenwright now attempts to give the show a second wind in the West End. On the evidence of this much lower-tech but heartfelt revival, are we guilty of underestimating Whistle Down the Wind?

The short answer is: no. Lloyd Webber and his lyricist, Jim Steinman, have uprooted Mary Hayley Bell's novel (made famous by Bryan Forbes' exquisite black-and-white film) from its setting in bleak rural Lancashire and transplanted it to the Bible Belt of late 1950s Louisiana where bigots can't see a tub without thumping it and where faith has to be proved by wrestling with snakes. The shift means that Lloyd Webber can indulge his penchant for pastiche - the lively, if synthetic-sounding, score draws on gospel, soul, rock'n'roll, and revivalist chorale as well as the usual pop-opera. But it also means that a touching, achingly restrained story is jacked up into an overheated melodrama.

In the movie, the Hayley Mills character, who finds an escaped murderer in the barn and mistakes him for Jesus, is a child, and the strength of her feelings towards this figure has a pre-sexual innocence. In the musical, Swallow (affectingly sung here by the likeable but bland Claire Marlowe) is a motherless adolescent. As well as making her seem simple-minded in not connecting the stranger with the radio announcements about a killer on the loose, this alteration introduces a current of unconscious sexual attraction to her dealings with the Man, strikingly played by the rugged Tim Rogers.

It's a rare and intriguing musical where, on balance, you would rather the leading lady and the leading man did not get it together. But though there are some good numbers along the way - particularly "The Nature of the Beast" - the show blows it. We want Swallow to grow up - to realise the truth and still feel complicated love for the wronged man. Instead, she clings to her faith that he's Jesus.

The show exploits the idea of infantile innocence more shamelessly than the convict ever does. I loved Kenwright's production of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat. Not even he, though, can breathe freshness into these cloying kiddie ensemble numbers.

To 12 August (0870 145 1163)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in