Vincent in Brixton, Cottesloe Theatre, London

Alternative portrait of an artist as a young man

Paul Taylor
Thursday 02 May 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

England is a country where an astonishing array of international luminaries (from Nijinsky to Simone Weil) have wound up dying. Fewer famous foreigners have cut their teeth here. An exception is Vincent Van Gogh who, in 1873 at the age of 20, was sent from Holland to the London branch of a firm of art dealers.

At that stage, though, there were few signs that this unprecocious figure would become a genius. It was six years before he announced his decision to live for, and by, painting. And in between, he made a fervent and failed bid to become a preacher. Premiered now in Richard Eyre's intimate and beautifully acted production, Nicholas Wright's subtle, insightful new play focuses on the Vincent who, newly arrived in this country, had yet to find his true vocation.

It's on record that Vincent lodged in Brixton with a schoolteaching widow, Ursula Loyer, and that he developed a crushing unrequited passion for her daughter, Eugene. Supplementing and readjusting this bald scenario with imaginative speculation, the play offers an intriguing alternative Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.

Jochum Ten Haaf is superbly funny and moving as the naïve, outspoken and rather absurd newcomer who, in this version, finds himself in a tragi-comic predicament. Sworn to silence over his physical infatuation with the daughter, he discovers a strong mental affinity with the mother who has held him to this pledge. Played in a performance of remarkable empathy by Claire Higgins, Ursula is a deep depressive whose condition allows her flashes of visionary intensity. In her, Vincent finds a mirror and eventually a lover. When she talks of her moments of charged insight into, say, the profoundly contrasting blackness and light of a starry sky, she could be describing future paintings by the artist.

One of the virtues of the play is that it doesn't pretend that inspiration works in a straight line. For example, Ursula's gift to Vincent initially leads him into eschewing art and wanting to emulate the ministry of Christ. It's only at the very end that we see a way in which these two urges in him might creatively coalesce.

In movies, Van Gogh has featured as the clichéd epitome of the tortured genius. Avoiding all such melodrama, Vincent in Brixton shows us that genius in gestation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in