The School for Scandal, theatre review: Richard Sheridan's satire still presses buttons
Andrew Hilton’s production bears its topicality well in the age of social media
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
In an age where reputations are won and lost at the click of an iPhone, Richard Sheridan’s The School for Scandal is a canny choice for a revival at the Tobacco Factory.
That said, had it not been for a newly added prologue and epilogue, in which Sheridan’s simpering poet Sir Benjamin Backbite (played with smug glee by Byron Mondahl) prances around the stage snapping selfies and pretending to defame audience members on Twitter, the point might have been lost. This is otherwise a production faithful to the 18th-century text.
After such an energetic start, Sheridan’s acidic satire on society gossip-mongering languished through the first half, despite a wonderfully gaspy performance from Fiona Sheehan as inveterate gossip Mrs Candour. But the second half was up to pantomime-worthy pace. Neat devices such as the audience standing in for ancestral portraits and a nice moment involving a stocking used as a neckerchief to cover up some hanky-panky earned well-deserved chortles.
As we look forward to an election fuelled by social media, Andrew Hilton’s production bears its topicality well.
To 9 May (0117 902 0344)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments