O Go My Man, Royal Court Downstairs, London

To be a Celtic tiger you need claws

Kate Bassett
Sunday 22 January 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The surprise is that Feehily seems half-inclined to write a sitcom with surreal flashes. Sarah staggers around in a panto Cheshire Cat outfit and, in one hallucinatory mock-vengeance vignette, mimes gunning down a nasty ad director. The overall result is curiously uneven: sporadically startling and funny, elsewhere feeble and borrowing ideas from Patrick Marber, Neil LaBute or Mark Ravenhill.

Fierce moments surface in the private bust-ups, which feel autobiographically informed, tender and acidic. However, the games played with art and life are hardly up there with Pirandello or satirically on a par with Extras. O Go My Man raises, yet never really tackles, big ethical questions about Ireland's tiger economy, Third World news coverage and media exposés. The issue of individuals sliding between passionate commitment, compromise and selling-out, likewise, comes too rarely into focus.

Its director Max Stafford-Clark is acclaimed for his work with new playwrights, but this piece feels baggy and stylistically out of joint. The rapid-fire delivery of lines, early on, is tiresomely unnatural and Feehily actually has more of an ear for colloquial talk than this conveys. Hickey and Stewart seem almost too rushed to exude real pain and addictiveness. Still, Lynch is compulsive viewing and very droll as she drags herself inelegantly into her fishnets.

Commendations are also due to Es Devlin, whose set - a room mocked-up in plywood with sliding panels - has a mutability reflecting the characters' lives and a quiet sense of loss, with the furnishings of previous scenes leaving their ghostly outlines in gaffer tape. Essentially, however, Feehily is a fledgling writer not ready for this mainhouse exposure. The Court's 50th anniversary fare will surely improve or, for now, check out the readings of vintage hits in the Theatre Upstairs.

To 11 February (020 7565 5000), then touring

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in