Exiles, National Theatre Cottesloe, London <!-- none onestar twostar threestar fourstar -->

Rhoda Koenig
Friday 04 August 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Unseen here since Harold Pinter directed it in 1970, James Joyce's only play has been revived by James Macdonald in a production that is a poem and a revelation. For three hours, we experience that rare quality on the contemporary stage - stillness - and never for a second does it lose its grip.

Joyce wrote Exiles in 1915, after he and his common-law wife had, like his fictional couple, spent several years in Italy. Now Richard, a noble failure as a writer, has come home, but hasn't decided whether to stay. His boyhood friend Robert, now a journalist, is a slick success but a moral weakling - and he knows it, striking poses of nonchalance before the odd, intense man who has rejected Dublin for the intellectual and sexual life that can only exist elsewhere.

Their rivalry finds a simpler focus in Bertha, Richard's wife, whom Robert coveted before they wed. He begins courting her again, and seeks an assignation. But here the drama is stood on its head: Bertha has been reporting Robert's every move to Richard, who tells her that she is free, if she wishes, to go to him.

It is astonishing to find that nearly everything written about this play proves not to be true. Richard is not arrogant and self-pitying; he is bitter and confused. Nor is the triangle Richard's vicarious way of consummating a homosexual attraction to his friend. One line refers to this, but it is far outweighed by their resentment and competition.

The trouble between husband and wife seems a more common one - Richard needs the bold, sensual Bertha (as Joyce did Nora) for his sexual and creative fulfilment, but being the weaker of the two fills him with self-loathing. To compensate, he undermines her - encouraging their son, for example, to rebellion by telling him that Bertha's discipline is cruelly repressive.

The language, though formal, is not, as most writers say, stilted and unplayable, but full of the poetry of ordinary things. That is respected by the actors (Adrian Dunbar as Robert, Peter McDonald as Richard, Dervla Kirwan as Bertha); by Peter Mumford's lighting; and by Hildegard Bechtler's spare set. It suits, as well, Joyce's moments of romantic grandeur: "The rest of life," says Bertha, referring to the days of her youth and love, "is good for nothing except remembering that time."

To 26 October (020-7452 3000; www.nationaltheatre.org.uk). A version of this review has already appeared in some editions

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in