Arturo Ui, Bridewell Theatre, London

Sanctimonious play diminishes Hitler to a petty thief

Rhoda Koenig
Tuesday 30 July 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If you want to see Arturo Ui, I certainly recommend Phil Willmott's production. While hardly without flaws, it has some cracking performances. But should one be that keen to see it at all? Good plays are often underestimated when poorly presented; here, though, with no such excuses to be made for it, we can see the faults of Bertolt Brecht's work.

Brecht wrote The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui in 1941, but commercial and political considerations kept it from the stage until 1958 (1961 in English), after his death. The title character is a parody of Hitler, here a Chicago gangster who muscles in on the Cauliflower Trust. Through blackmail, extortion, and murder, he not only controls the town's turnips and tomatoes but grabs more and more political power.

The main problem is that the idea of the Fuhrer as a petty crook, while daring once, is now a commonplace. Indeed, the play, by diminishing him with ridicule, diminishes his crimes as well. He appears no more than absurd and vulgar.

Another is Brecht's substitution of vegetables for bootleg whiskey as the key to power in Chicago. It simply gives us a Chicago in which grocers are intimidated instead of people in the liquor traffic – which, as a then-illegal trade with widespread public support, is a far more potent example of corruption.

Peter Polycarpou, as Ui, is too little the feral creature, too much the clown. But Peter Stenson is excellent as a straw-hatted businessman oozing benignity and chicanery in equal measure, as is Justin Deaville as a tough but gentlemanly prosecutor. Best of all is Kevin Moore as an actor with the unenviable job of giving the would-be Marc Antony some class.

The play ends with victims of rape and torture begging an unsympathetic English panel for asylum while we are asked why we're so indifferent to evil.

The irrelevance provokes the question: Are Hitler's murders now considered so trivial that they can be an excuse for free-floating sanctimony?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in