Nobody expects the Spanish inquisition: Monty Python stars go to High Court over Spamalot royalties dispute

 

Matilda Battersby
Friday 30 November 2012 16:09 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Members of comic tour de force Monty Python are embroiled in a legal dispute over hit musical Spamalot that has been taken to the High Court.

Three of the original six Pythons, Eric Idle, Michael Palin and Terry Jones, will give evidence during five-day legal proceedings brought by the producer of 1975 film Monty Python And The Holy Grail. The other remaining Pythons, John Cleese and Terry Gilliam, are abroad and not expected to attend.

Mark Forstater's lawyers say he is entitled to royalties running into hundreds of thousands of pounds from stage musical Spamalot, a spin-off to the Grail film.

His lawyer Tom Weisselberg argued that for “financial purposes” Forstater should be treated as “the seventh Python”. The sixth, Graham Chapman, died in 1989.

Weisselberg told Justice Norris that the Pythons were "unjustifiably attempting to secure more money from Spamalot at the expense of Mr Forstater and his company".

He said his client was “in difficult financial circumstances and has been forced to bring these proceedings.

Spamalot posters describe the production as "lovingly ripped off from the motion picture".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in