The treasure buried in ancient Acts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The idea that cultural treasure should be returned is not new. "We are the target, if that's the right word, of the most famous request of all," says Andrew Hamilton of the British Museum. He means the Elgin Marbles, a collection of ancient Greek sculptures and fragments brought from the Parthenon in 1801. They were the first authentic classical Greek sculpture to be displayed in London, where they caused a sensation. Unfortunately the Greek government does not accept that the original sale was legal, and has asked for them back. So far the answer has been a polite but firm refusal.
At the British Museum they prefer to call them the Sculptures of the Parthenon. They are particular about language, choosing to use the word "restitution" rather than the more loaded term "repatriation". The museum is crowded with objects of special cultural or spiritual significance to people groups all over the world, but Mr Hamilton claims there are no outstanding requests. That seems remarkable until he reveals that as an international museum it is only obliged to recognise requests that come directly from governments.
Pressure groups and campaigners need not waste their ink. Applications have been received from Maori and Aboriginal Australian representatives, he says, but they were not made by governments so they were "treated differently". Although the case of the Lakota Ghost Dance Shirt had made those in charge of all museums "sit up and think", Mr Hamilton said the outcome would not affect his own institution. The trustees were not about to dismember collections that were best seen as a whole.
In any case, the British Museum Act of 1963 made it illegal for them to dispose of any object at all, from any collection in the museum. "It would take another act of parliament before we could do that," said Hamilton. So that's that, then. CM
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments