The Guillotine: Twentieth-Century Classics That Won't Last No 32: Rudolph Valentino

Gilbert Adair
Sunday 15 August 1999 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

He was born in Castellanata in Italy in 1895, the year the cinema, too, was born. And just as the medium in which he would make his reputation initially saddled itself with such top-heavy names as kinetoscope and praxinoscope and the next-to-unpronouncable phenakitoscope before it was finally agreed to call it the cinema, so he was actually christened Rodolfo Alfonzo Raffaele Pierre Philibert Gugliemi. As the first and by far the sexiest of Hollywood's Latin lovers, however, he became famous - became, indeed, the most famous film star of his day - as Rudolph Valentino. Or just Valentino.

So languorously potent was his eroticism, that name began to be employed in a generic sense. "He's a real Valentino," people would say of some dapper ladies' man, exactly as they might have said "a real Don Juan". This, in spite of the fact that his performances were far from universally appreciated (his public was exclusively feminine) and his androgynous mannerisms attracted media comment of a kind that nowadays would have everyone hauled into court. He was once alliteratively anathematised thus by an editorial in the Chicago Tribune: "When will we be rid of all these effeminate youths, pomaded, powdered, bejewelled and bedizened in the image of Rudy - that painted pansy?"

Valentino's death in 1926 (from a perforated ulcer) was, as they say, the first day of the second half of his life. His funeral was as starry and spectacular as a Hollywood premiere, with thousands of flamboyantly grieving women lining the streets and vague, never-to-be-confirmed rumours of mass suicides. He was no longer a star, he was a cult, a myth, an archetype, and his name lived on posthumously, like a racehorse that has thrown its jockey.

His films are seldom screened today, even in an archivist context, partly because all of them are silent but mostly because he never worked with a director worthy of his personality and, yes, his talent. The most celebrated, Rex Ingram's The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, an overlong and overwrought melodrama, deserves to be seen only for its leading man. As with the Cheshire Cat's smile, everything of Valentino has faded except the name - and, in a supreme indignity, even that has now had to yield to an Italian dress designer.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in