TELEVISION / Fable talk: Thomas Sutcliffe on Omnibus on Angela Carter

Thomas Sutcliffe
Tuesday 15 September 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

OMNIBUS' (BBC 2) profile of Angela Carter was effectively converted into a late obituary by her premature death earlier this year. It was all the more to its credit, then, that in its broadcast form it preserved some irreverent questions about her work - not 'was it any good?' so much as 'was it bearable?' Literary programmes (indeed arts programmes as a whole) often take it for granted that the object of their attentions has an uncontested virtue - conveying by implication the strong message that only philistines would demur.

So it was an extra strength of Lorna Sage's defence of the writer that she actually gave voice to the fact that some people wouldn't like the writing. She suggested that it was due to some insufficiency in the readers (Carter's refusal to segregate fantasy in some fairy-tale ghetto frightened them apparently, the wimps) but that's fair enough in literary dispute and the simple acknowledgement that it wasn't an open and shut case was refreshing enough.

The producer had obviously put the question a little more directly, one which could only be inferred from Carter's flaring response - 'I'm an arty person. OK, I write overblown, purple, self-indulgent prose. So what?' This was said with a little giggle but came out with just a little too much pressure to be passed off as relaxed self-deprecation. In fact it fitted the youthful pictures of her rather better than the other more equable extracts from her interview. In almost all the snapshots she had a tilt to the head which was a little essay on the ambiguity of the word 'teasing' - its compound of coquetry and aggression.

With the biography, that siren lure for the makers of literary documentaries, the right decisions had been made too. Carter delivered her own early life as a fable itself, using the local Odeon (a grand Art Deco building in Tooting) as a symbol of her adult preoccupations, the tension between an ordered exterior and the fantastic gimcrack liberty of the interior. She wasn't entirely dependable in her memories - recalling her upbringing as bohemian then making comic mileage out of her mother's strict insistence that she go to work in black stockings, long black skirt and no make-up - dress that had been the epitome of respectability in the 1920s but which had become a badge of beatnik wildness by Carter's time. The inconsistency didn't matter because it was consistent with her passion for self-constructed images. It was, paradoxically, what you rarely get in literary profiles, an author at work.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in