Silly Questions: Basics to back
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TODAY we have dinosaurs and gloves, but first the only letter we have ever received addressed to 'Silly Questions Agony Uncle', marked 'urgent'.
Ms Darling (who insists that is her real name) seeks inspiration: 'What is a suitable Valentine that a post-feminist might give to a pre-feminist, only just post-adolescent, fifty- something male to convey her sincere affection?'
Last week, we asked how the dinosaurs would explain the extinction of mankind if time ran backwards. Policy 'Basics to Back' Major's John is Len Clarke's answer. Fiona and John Earle, however, have a carbon-based explanation deduced from the symbiotic relationship between man and car: humanity became extinct when petrol turned into trees.
Daniel Wood has two theories: extinction could have followed the inexplicable loss of toe-nails during the early (or late from the conventional perspective) Stone Age. Or it could be something to do with 'the extraordinary way that the females of the species appear to indulge in a very painful and nine-month long ingestion of their own children'.
How should two people share a pair of gloves efficiently? Stuart Cockerill advises drawing up a legal contract 'guaranteeing each a share in each glove should they separate'. Mark Salisbury halves each glove to create two mittens and two thumb-and- finger warmers.
Geoffrey Langley dates that approach back to an 1847 paper by the Austrian philosopher J L Fingerlstein who cited it as an application of Boolean conditional branching to the Circular Theory of Diminishing Reciprocity. Anyway, Mr Langley's great aunt found Fingerlstein's methods very satisfactory when sharing a pair of gloves with her governess in Lucerne many years ago.
This week, Gavin Dobson, inspired by Lithuania, wants to know where you get an application form to join Nato, and how a newly independent nation gets around the problem of having to give the names of referees who have known it for three years.
David Young wants to know what happened to the Morris Major, and B O'Byrne seeks an explanation for scissors and trousers only occurring in pairs. Answers and more questions to Silly Questions, The Independent, 40 City Road, London EC1Y 2DB.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments