Silly Question: A loo, but not as we know it

William Hartston
Wednesday 12 May 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

DOZENS of readers were inspired by C Dye's question last week to boldly write about lavatories on the SS Enterprise. Most explain it through the Starship's mission: 'to boldly go where no man has gone before', but this fails to account for the absence of ladies' loos.

Others lay the blame on the no-zipper jump suits worn by the crew, suggesting that their waste products are beamed up, but the most exhaustive explanation comes from Jonathan Laban.

He blames the apparent loolessness on the Klingons and their envy of the technological expertise of Starship Command that enables their ships to be fitted with doors that go Sheesh. The highly secret sheeshing mechanism is, he claims, hidden under the cistern in the toilet complex on deck 3b, out of bounds to film crew. We omit his accounts of Star Trek the film and Star Trek the New Generation on grounds of good taste and space (the final frontier) respectively.

Which brings us to why triangular sandwiches are posher than square. Several point out that triangles stand up better, apex uppermost, on the serving plate, and Simon Cuff offers a traditional verse: If served with sandwich of squared bread,/ Your guest will frown and turn his head./ Happier he'll be by far/ If their shape's triangular.

Canon A D Rogers, however, religiously believes that triangular sandwiches were introduced as 'a triumphalist statement of Trinitarianism by the second wave of the Oxford Movement' as a protest against the straight-cut sandwiches of Unitarians and the crustless sarnies of the American Transcendentalists. 'The addition of parsley,' he notes, 'is attributed to Bishop Gore and his Kenotic Christology,' though the underlying symbolism is hotly disputed.

Many readers have written in to ask why there is only one Monopolies Commission. It's an old question, but answers are still welcome.

Andy King wants to know how to convince his boss to send him on an assertiveness course, and Alan Taylor asks: 'When we put the clocks forward in the spring, where does the lost hour go until we reclaim it in the autumn?' Replies and more questions to: Silly Questions, The Independent, 40 City Road, London EC1Y 2DB.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in