Right of Reply: Peter York
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The social critic responds to a piece by Anne McElvoy on his research
into career women
ANNE MCELVOY is clearly two people - Anne Sploggs and Elvira McElvoy. Anne Sploggs read the article about our research among senior women and chose to misunderstand it and generate some funny copy.
She says that we concluded that women pass through the glass ceiling in a mystical way. But we didn't and they don't - they just don't spend a lot of time agonising about it - they've been too busy doing something very well.
She also attributes to us the notion that miracle women have learnt not to be too intense and ambitious. We didn't say that. We said that our successful women told us that young women now tend to be too intense and ambitious for its own sake. Ambitious? Of course they're ambitious - to achieve and contribute and get rewards - not just to have "drama, excitement and the acclaim of millions", as we used to say at school.
The idea that Peter York would outlaw dressing up is mad. Peter York's preferred dress code for women is formal, produced and done up to the nines. Again, we simply observed that power dressing wasn't what these women did. They were aware that how they look matters but, by either instinct or good sense, knew that "in your face" dressing up can look slightly ridiculous to real-world inhabitants (cf fashionland).
But then the other personality, clever Elvira, takes over and produces some perfectly sensible observations. Then she ends by reverting to a bit of Lee-Potterism with a revelation of the kind served up as wisdom by fathers of brides at buffers' weddings.
Anyone who, like me, makes his living studying social trends has been living with the amazing thought that women are people too for an awful long time.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments