Right of Reply; Mick Jagger
The decision to cancel concerts was forced on us, says the lead singer of the Rolling Stones
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WE ARE very disappointed to have to postpone our British concerts. But following the decision to change the tax laws retrospectively and tax Britons who spend most of the year out of the country, we would have run our entire European tour at a considerable loss. I should stress that we were not using a tax loophole. The scheme was set up by Denis Healey, a Labour chancellor, and has been in use for two decades. There was nothing clandestine about it and it is used by a wide variety of people working overseas.
Whatever the Treasury says, these changes are being introduced retrospectively. This is highly unusual. The government has every right to change the tax laws but we would have expected the new regulations to come into effect at the end of the tax year, not in the middle.
Our tax adviser said the band and 40 members of the road crew would face a huge tax bill. We offered to play the UK shows for charity but the Revenue rejected the suggestion. So we were forced to make a decision: either Charlie, Ronnie and myself were to swallow an unexpected pounds 12m tax bill, putting the tour into the red, or postpone the dates.
It is not just the band who are affected. Our crew signed up on the basis that their earnings would be free of tax in Britain because they were hardly in the country. Already the manager of an American act has told us they may not hire British technicians because they won't want to work in the UK, which is a vital part of any European tour. This was a very difficult decision for us, and it is not a tax protest.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments