Right of Reply: Michael Hardern
The founder of Members for Conversion responds to Andreas Whittam Smith
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ANDREAS WHITTAM Smith's argument ("Mutual societies are going, just when we need them most", 18 January), that Friendly Societies and Building Societies can provide us with significant advantages rests on a myth.
It's all about money. Mutuality gives three quarters of its members just pounds 10 a year or less. Conversion into public companies gives a one-off windfall of around pounds 2,000.
Mutuality has served its time, and needs to make way for the innovation and competition of the plc. It has inherited its wealth and is showering its beneficence on those who actually need it least, frequently those who are not even members of the mutual society - that is, those who can afford to raise the largest mortgages.
The claim that mutuals don't rip off their customers is laughable. They invented the idea of luring unsophisticated investors through the door with high interest rates on selected accounts, and then dropping those rates as soon as their attention was turned. They were repossessing homes with the best of them during the property crash. It is only as a result of the conversion campaign that they have discovered the advantages of mutuality.
Mutuality is a wonderful idea - don't get me wrong - where people help others less fortunate than themselves. But it has been hijacked, and small savers are being denied a windfall and are subsidising the mortgages or pensions of people much better off.
Capital and invention are what produce advantage. Mutuality has stagnated. Unless it can deliver substantial bonuses it won't survive - or deserve to. The democratic deficit in the building societies beggars belief.
Jam today, please!
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments