Right of Reply: Katherine Hann
On Monday, Charles Arthur wrote of a dispute over the fate of the Exploratory, Bristol's science museum. Here, the director of its successor, Explore-at-Bristol, responds
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CHARLES ARTHUR ("pounds 97m spent on `silly' revamp of museum", 30 August) is right to pay tribute to Professor Richard Gregory and the Exploratory, the existing Bristol science centre, and all they have done for science. In praising these achievements, he does not, however, do justice to the new science centre, Explore-at-Bristol, opening in spring 2000, which takes forward the work of the Exploratory in new ways.
Explore is part of "at-Bristol", a pounds 97m landmark millennium project in the centre of the city. We are seeking to widen the appeal of science, nature and the arts and two new centres are being created, Explore-at- Bristol and Wildscreen-at-Bristol, as well as a public art programme throughout the new squares and walkways. At-Bristol focuses on people, their brains and how this affects the way they see the world, their dreams for technology, their piece in evolution and their impact on the planet.
Although we are firm supporters of "hands-on" science, there is no doubt that it is best applied to 18th- and 19th-century science phenomena such as light, electricity and magnetism. For many newer areas of science, different techniques are needed. They are still interactive, but we want to choose the best method for communicating messages and encouraging people to explore the world around them.
And that's the point; just as the Exploratory set new standards in its time, so Explore will be setting new standards for the 21st century. Indeed, Dr Alan Friedman, director of the New York Hall of Science, recently said: "At-Bristol has every sign of becoming a winner, and the first true 21st- century science centre."
But don't take his word for it. Come and judge for yourself when we open in spring 2000.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments